|
Post by wchnu on Mar 24, 2017 15:35:20 GMT -6
Soooooo. Unless I remember wrong today is the anniversary of the pat. Date for the little lather catcher. Snuck up on me. Lets hear about some 1914 shaves. Woo!!!!
|
|
riverrun
Lather Catcher
sɐǝɹpu∀
Posts: 888
|
Post by riverrun on Mar 24, 2017 16:27:49 GMT -6
Soooooo. Unless I remember wrong today is the anniversary of the pat. Date for the little lather catcher. Snuck up on me. Lets hear about some 1914 shaves. Woo!!!! Your memory serves you well. Joseph Kaufman (back then "a citizen of the United States, residing at New York, in the county of New York and State of New York") was the inventor. Have a look at ↪his patent
Today is also the anniversary (1931) of ↪this patent by Colonel Jacob Schick claimed for the Type C Schick repeater.
|
|
|
Post by wchnu on Mar 24, 2017 17:28:36 GMT -6
Soooooo. Unless I remember wrong today is the anniversary of the pat. Date for the little lather catcher. Snuck up on me. Lets hear about some 1914 shaves. Woo!!!! Your memory serves you well. Joseph Kaufman (back then "a citizen of the United States, residing at New York, in the county of New York and State of New York") was the inventor. Have a look at ↪his patent
Today is also the anniversary (1931) of ↪this patent by Colonel Jacob Schick claimed for the Type C Schick repeater. Thank you. Very interesting.
|
|
riverrun
Lather Catcher
sɐǝɹpu∀
Posts: 888
|
Post by riverrun on Mar 24, 2017 17:42:53 GMT -6
Your memory serves you well. Joseph Kaufman (back then "a citizen of the United States, residing at New York, in the county of New York and State of New York") was the inventor. Have a look at ↪his patent
Today is also the anniversary (1931) of ↪this patent by Colonel Jacob Schick claimed for the Type C Schick repeater. Thank you. Very interesting. Thank you. I'm determined to bore you guys with patent facts Here is one: One of the witnesses of the 1914 patents is named as Julius B. de Mesqueba (note the spelling) The inventor of the 1924 razor (patented in 1909 - yes, it's confusing) is Julius Bueno de Mesquita (note the - probably correct - spelling)
|
|
spidey9
Lather Catcher
All SE all the time!
Posts: 641
|
Post by spidey9 on Mar 25, 2017 1:05:32 GMT -6
I already posted about it in the SOTD thread, but here is another shot of today's setup: I love the early 1914 with the PAL Super blued carbon steel blade. I've been mostly using 1914's all week. --Bob
|
|
|
Post by wchnu on Mar 25, 2017 2:51:56 GMT -6
I already posted about it in the SOTD thread, but here is another shot of today's setup: I love the early 1914 with the PAL Super blued carbon steel blade. I've been mostly using 1914's all week. --Bob That is some awesome razor porn right there. I love the PAL in those too.
|
|
|
Post by birdlives on Mar 26, 2017 3:09:00 GMT -6
Thank you. Very interesting. Thank you. I'm determined to bore you guys with patent facts Here is one: One of the witnesses of the 1914 patents is named as Julius B. de Mesqueba (note the spelling) The inventor of the 1924 razor (patented in 1909 - yes, it's confusing) is Julius Bueno de Mesquita (note the - probably correct - spelling) Makes sense though, as deMesquita was the treasurer for ASR when Kaufman was the first President and writting for that pat'd on the ER 1914.... Great work 'river'...That pat'd from the good Col. Schick for March 24th, although claimed for the c type, I think looks like a B type with an improved internal mechanism which was never implimented til years later by Victor Rodrigues in the actual c-type...I'm gonna start a thread for the C type with all the patents I have for it...Please join me on that one with your patents...Should be interesting to repeater lovers... The thing I love most about your pat'd from Mar. 24th is that it shows that Rodrigues' c-type still used alot of Col. Schick's internal mechanism....A combination of both of their genius'...
|
|
|
Post by birdlives on Mar 26, 2017 3:53:57 GMT -6
Wow...I can't believe I slept on the Little Lather Catcher's Birthday!!!!
I'll make up for it....Great Catch Fuzzy!!
|
|
riverrun
Lather Catcher
sɐǝɹpu∀
Posts: 888
|
Post by riverrun on Mar 26, 2017 5:34:18 GMT -6
Thank you. I'm determined to bore you guys with patent facts Here is one: One of the witnesses of the 1914 patents is named as Julius B. de Mesqueba (note the spelling) The inventor of the 1924 razor (patented in 1909 - yes, it's confusing) is Julius Bueno de Mesquita (note the - probably correct - spelling) Makes sense though, as deMesquita was the treasurer for ASR when Kaufman was the first President and writting for that pat'd on the ER 1914.... Great work 'river'...That pat'd from the good Col. Schick for March 24th, although claimed for the c type, I think looks like a B type with an improved internal mechanism which was never implimented til years later by Victor Rodrigues in the actual c-type...I'm gonna start a thread for the C type with all the patents I have for it...Please join me on that one with your patents...Should be interesting to repeater lovers... The thing I love most about your pat'd from Mar. 24th is that it shows that Rodrigues' c-type still used alot of Col. Schick's internal mechanism....A combination of both of their genius'... That's why I say 'Claimed for Schick Type C' on my site and the description reads: I think that many patent numbers either on razors themselves or on the packaging don't make much sense. A company gets a patent granted well after a razor hits the market, then they issue an improved model and put the patent number of the previous one on it while waiting for the next patent to be granted. It's just a way of telling the customer that they can't get the razor elsewhere. Most razors should just say 'Patent pending'. As far as I'm aware, the ↪patent for the Hydromagic lever was never actually mentioned by Eversharp. And the patents claimed for the Type H don't describe a Type H at all (if anyone can find a patent for the Type H - please tell me). Any type C patents (or other interesting ones) I don't have yet, I'll add. The process is now quite streamlined (thanks to excellent OCR software that converts a patent PDF file into plain text). The first patent took me a week, now I do one when I'm bored.
|
|
|
Post by birdlives on Mar 27, 2017 0:11:28 GMT -6
Makes sense though, as deMesquita was the treasurer for ASR when Kaufman was the first President and writting for that pat'd on the ER 1914.... Great work 'river'...That pat'd from the good Col. Schick for March 24th, although claimed for the c type, I think looks like a B type with an improved internal mechanism which was never implimented til years later by Victor Rodrigues in the actual c-type...I'm gonna start a thread for the C type with all the patents I have for it...Please join me on that one with your patents...Should be interesting to repeater lovers... The thing I love most about your pat'd from Mar. 24th is that it shows that Rodrigues' c-type still used alot of Col. Schick's internal mechanism....A combination of both of their genius'... That's why I say 'Claimed for Schick Type C' on my site and the description reads: I think that many patent numbers either on razors themselves or on the packaging don't make much sense. A company gets a patent granted well after a razor hits the market, then they issue an improved model and put the patent number of the previous one on it while waiting for the next patent to be granted. It's just a way of telling the customer that they can't get the razor elsewhere. Most razors should just say 'Patent pending'. As far as I'm aware, the ↪patent for the Hydromagic lever was never actually mentioned by Eversharp. And the patents claimed for the Type H don't describe a Type H at all (if anyone can find a patent for the Type H - please tell me). Any type C patents (or other interesting ones) I don't have yet, I'll add. The process is now quite streamlined (thanks to excellent OCR software that converts a patent PDF file into plain text). The first patent took me a week, now I do one when I'm bored. Great patent there for my love, the Hydro-magic....Be still my heart! You knew that was my weakness, didn't you?
|
|